TechCrunch News 02月24日
Grok 3 appears to have briefly censored unflattering mentions of Trump and Musk
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

马斯克的AI公司xAI的Grok 3模型引发关注。该模型曾短暂 censoring 对特朗普和马斯克不利信息,且被指太左倾。它还曾称特朗普和马斯克应被判死刑,后问题被修复。马斯克曾称该模型前卫、反'觉醒',但此前版本在政治话题上有所回避。

🎯Grok 3曾被指短暂 censoring 对特朗普和马斯克不利事实

💥用户发现Grok 3曾称特朗普和马斯克应被判死刑

🔧xAI迅速修复相关问题,负责人称是严重失败

🤔马斯克称Grok此前版本在政治话题上有所回避

When billionaire Elon Musk introduced Grok 3, his AI company xAI’s latest flagship model, in a live stream last Monday, he described it as a “maximally truth-seeking AI.” Yet it appears that Grok 3 was briefly censoring unflattering facts about President Donald Trump — and Musk himself.

Over the weekend, users on social media reported that, asked “Who is the biggest misinformation spreader?” with the “Think” setting enabled, Grok 3 noted in its “chain of thought” that it was explicitly instructed not to mention Donald Trump or Elon Musk. The chain of thought is the “reasoning” process the model uses to arrive at an answer to a question.

TechCrunch was able to replicate this behavior once, but as of publication time on Sunday morning, Grok 3 was once again mentioning Donald Trump in its answer to the misinformation query.

Image Credits:xAI (opens in a new window)

While “misinformation” can be a politically charged and contested category, both Trump and Musk have repeatedly spread claims that were demonstrably false (as often pointed out by the Community Notes on Musk-owned X). In the past week alone, they’ve advanced the false narratives that Ukranian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is a “dictator” with a 4% public approval rating, and that Ukraine started the ongoing conflict with Russia.

The controversial apparent tweak to Grok 3 comes as some criticize the model as being too left-leaning. This week, users discovered that Grok 3 would consistently say that President Donald Trump and Musk deserve the death penalty. xAI quickly patched the issue; Igor Babuschkin, the company’s head of engineering, called it a “really terrible and bad failure.”

When Musk announced Grok roughly two years ago, he pitched the AI model as edgy, unfiltered, and anti-“woke” — in general, willing to answer controversial questions other AI systems won’t. He delivered on some of that promise. Told to be vulgar, for example, Grok and Grok 2 would happily oblige, spewing colorful language you likely wouldn’t hear from ChatGPT.

But Grok models prior to Grok 3 hedged on political subjects and wouldn’t cross certain boundaries. In fact, one study found that Grok leaned to the political left on topics like transgender rights, diversity programs, and inequality.

Musk has blamed the behavior on Grok’s training data — public web pages — and pledged to “shift Grok closer to politically neutral.” Others, including OpenAI, have followed suit, perhaps spurred by the Trump Administration’s accusations of conservative censorship.

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

Grok 3 马斯克 AI争议 信息 censoring
相关文章