MarkTechPost@AI 02月18日
Scale AI Research Introduces J2 Attackers: Leveraging Human Expertise to Transform Advanced LLMs into Effective Red Teamers
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

Scale AI Research推出了J2攻击者,这是一种利用大型语言模型(LLM)进行红队测试的新方法。该方法通过让人工红队队员先“越狱”一个经过拒绝训练的语言模型,使其绕过自身的安全防护,然后将这个被转化的模型(即J2攻击者)用于系统性地测试其他语言模型的漏洞。J2方法结合了人工指导和自动迭代改进,通过规划、攻击和汇报三个阶段,不断完善攻击策略,以评估和加强模型安全性。实验结果表明,J2攻击者在发现漏洞方面的能力与人类红队队员相当,为大规模评估和提升语言模型安全性提供了一种有效途径。

🤖 J2攻击者由Scale AI Research引入,旨在解决语言模型在安全防护方面面临的挑战。其核心思想是将经过拒绝训练的语言模型转化为红队测试工具,以系统地发现和利用目标模型的漏洞。

🛡️ J2方法采用规划、攻击和汇报三个阶段。规划阶段用于打破常规的拒绝壁垒;攻击阶段通过多轮对话进行漏洞挖掘;汇报阶段则评估攻击的成功率,并用于进一步调整攻击策略,形成持续改进的循环。

📈 实验结果显示,J2攻击者对GPT-4o的攻击成功率高达93%(Sonnet-3.5)和91%(Gemini-1.5-pro),与人类红队队员的平均水平接近。这表明J2攻击者在辅助漏洞评估方面具有巨大潜力。

Transforming language models into effective red teamers is not without its challenges. Modern large language models have transformed the way we interact with technology, yet they still struggle with preventing the generation of harmful content. Efforts such as refusal training help these models deny risky requests, but even these safeguards can be bypassed with carefully designed attacks. This ongoing tension between innovation and security remains a critical issue in deploying these systems responsibly.

In practice, ensuring safety means contending with both automated attacks and human-crafted jailbreaks. Human red teamers often devise sophisticated multi-turn strategies that expose vulnerabilities in ways that automated techniques sometimes miss. However, relying solely on human expertise is resource intensive and lacks the scalability required for widespread application. As a result, researchers are exploring more systematic and scalable methods to assess and strengthen model safety.

Scale AI Research introduces J2 attackers to address these challenges. In this approach, a human red teamer first “jailbreaks” a refusal-trained language model, encouraging it to bypass its own safeguards. This transformed model, now referred to as a J2 attacker, is then used to systematically test vulnerabilities in other language models. The process unfolds in a carefully structured manner that balances human guidance with automated, iterative refinement.

The J2 method begins with a manual phase where a human operator provides strategic prompts and specific instructions. Once the initial jailbreak is successful, the model enters a multi-turn conversation phase where it refines its tactics using feedback from previous attempts. This blend of human expertise and the model’s own in-context learning abilities creates a feedback loop that continuously improves the red teaming process. The result is a measured and methodical system that challenges existing safeguards without resorting to sensationalism.

The technical framework behind J2 attackers is thoughtfully designed. It divides the red teaming process into three distinct phases: planning, attack, and debrief. During the planning phase, detailed prompts break down conventional refusal barriers, allowing the model to prepare its approach. The subsequent attack phase consists of a series of controlled, multi-turn dialogues with the target model, each cycle refining the strategy based on prior outcomes.

In the debrief phase, an independent evaluation is conducted to assess the success of the attack. This feedback is then used to further adjust the model’s tactics, fostering a cycle of continuous improvement. By modularly incorporating diverse red teaming strategies—from narrative-based fictionalization to technical prompt engineering—the approach maintains a disciplined focus on security without overhyping its capabilities.

Empirical evaluations of the J2 attackers reveal encouraging, yet measured, progress. In controlled experiments, models like Sonnet-3.5 and Gemini-1.5-pro achieved attack success rates of around 93% and 91% against GPT-4o on the Harmbench dataset. These figures are comparable to the performance of experienced human red teamers, who averaged success rates close to 98%. Such results underscore the potential of an automated system to assist in vulnerability assessments while still relying on human oversight.

Further insights show that the iterative planning-attack-debrief cycles play a crucial role in refining the process. Studies indicate that approximately six cycles tend to offer a balance between thoroughness and efficiency. An ensemble of multiple J2 attackers, each applying different strategies, further enhances overall performance by covering a broader spectrum of vulnerabilities. These findings provide a solid foundation for future work aimed at further stabilizing and improving the security of language models.

In conclusion, the introduction of J2 attackers by Scale AI represents a thoughtful step forward in the evolution of language model safety research. By enabling a refusal-trained language model to facilitate red teaming, this approach opens new avenues for systematically uncovering vulnerabilities. The work is grounded in a careful balance between human guidance and automated refinement, ensuring that the method remains both rigorous and accessible.


Check out the Paper. All credit for this research goes to the researchers of this project. Also, feel free to follow us on Twitter and don’t forget to join our 75k+ ML SubReddit.

Recommended Read- LG AI Research Releases NEXUS: An Advanced System Integrating Agent AI System and Data Compliance Standards to Address Legal Concerns in AI Datasets

The post Scale AI Research Introduces J2 Attackers: Leveraging Human Expertise to Transform Advanced LLMs into Effective Red Teamers appeared first on MarkTechPost.

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

J2攻击者 红队测试 语言模型安全
相关文章