Samaltman 02月10日
E Pur Si Muove
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

文章指出,旧金山在言论自由方面变得越来越保守,甚至不如北京。这种对异见的压制正在扼杀创新,导致聪明人离开。作者认为,为了获得真正的好想法,必须容忍那些看似糟糕和疯狂的想法。政治正确性虽然初衷是好的,但常常被滥用,阻碍了新思想的表达。作者担心,这种文化氛围会阻止像比特币这样的突破性想法的产生,并以SpaceX和伽利略为例,说明了创新可能面临的阻力。作者呼吁重视思想的自由交流,即使这意味着容忍令人不快的观点,因为审查制度并不能使世界变得更好。

🗣️旧金山对言论的限制日益加剧,使得人们在讨论有争议的想法时感到不自在,这与2005年相比发生了巨大变化,对创新生态系统产生了负面影响。

💡限制言论会限制思想,进而限制创新。历史上最成功的社会通常是最开放的社会。尽管主流观点通常是正确的,但真正推动世界前进的是那些不受欢迎的想法。

🚀在旧金山,一些从事智能增强药物、基因工程和激进生命延长等领域工作的可信人士,因为对其工作的反应过于负面而选择离开。例如,有人认为延长人类寿命会给环境带来灾难性后果,因此从事相关研究的人是不道德的。

⚖️为了获得真正的好想法,我们需要容忍那些看似糟糕和疯狂的想法。几乎所有伟大的突破性想法最初听起来都很糟糕。如果想要一个创新的文化,就不能允许存在异端邪说的概念。我们需要辩论实际的想法,而不是仅仅称对方为异端。

Earlierthis year, I noticed something in China that really surprised me.  Irealized I felt more comfortable discussing controversial ideas in Beijing thanin San Francisco.  I didn’t feel completely comfortable—this was China,after all—just more comfortable than at home.

That showed me just how bad things have become, and how much thingshave changed since I first got started here in 2005.

Itseems easier to accidentally speak heresies in San Francisco every year.  Debating a controversial idea, even if you95% agree with the consensus side, seems ill-advised.

This will be very bad for startups in the Bay Area.

Restrictingspeech leads to restricting ideas and therefore restricted innovation—the mostsuccessful societies have generally been the most open ones.  Usually mainstream ideas are right andheterodox ideas are wrong, but the true and unpopular ideas are what drive theworld forward.  Also, smart people tendto have an allergic reaction to the restriction of ideas, and I’m now seeingmany of the smartest people I know move elsewhere.

Itis bad for all of us when people can’t say that the world is a sphere, thatevolution is real, or that the sun is at the center of the solar system.

Morerecently, I’ve seen credible people working on ideas like pharmaceuticals forintelligence augmentation, genetic engineering, and radical life extensionleave San Francisco because they found the reaction to their work to be sotoxic.  “If people live a lot longer itwill be disastrous for the environment, so people working on this must bereally unethical” was a memorable quote I heard this year.

Toget the really good ideas, we need to tolerate really bad and wacky ideas too. In addition to the work Newton is best known for, he also studied alchemy(the British authorities banned work on this because they feared thedevaluation of gold) and considered himself to be someone specially chosen bythe almighty for the task of decoding Biblical scripture.  

Youcan’t tell which seemingly wacky ideas are going to turn out to be right, andnearly all ideas that turn out to be great breakthroughs start out soundinglike terrible ideas.  So if you want a culture that innovates, you can’thave a culture where you allow the concept of heresy—if you allow the conceptat all, it tends to spread.  When we movefrom strenuous debate about ideas to casting the people behind the ideas asheretics, we gradually stop debate on all controversial ideas.

Thisis uncomfortable, but it’s possible we have to allow people to say disparagingthings about gay people if we want them to be able to say novel things aboutphysics. [1] Of course we can and should say that ideas are mistaken, but wecan’t just call the person a heretic.  Weneed to debate the actual idea. 

Politicalcorrectness often comes from a good place—I think we should all be willing tomake accommodations to treat others well.  But too often it ends up beingused as a club for something orthogonal to protecting actual victims.  The best ideas are barely possible to expressat all, and if you’re constantly thinking about how everything you say might bemisinterpreted, you won’t let the best ideas get past the fragment stage.

Idon’t know who Satoshi is, but I’m skeptical that he, she, or they would havebeen able to come up with the idea for bitcoin immersed in the current culture ofSan Francisco—it would have seemed too crazy and too dangerous, with too manyways to go wrong.  If SpaceX started in San Francisco in 2017, I assumethey would have been attacked for focusing on problems of the 1%, or for doingsomething the government had already decided was too hard.  I can pictureGalileo looking up at the sky and whispering “E pur si muove” here today.


Followup: A Clarification



[1]I am less worried that letting some people on the internet say things like “gaypeople are evil” is going to convince reasonable people that such astatement is true than I fear losing the opposite—we needed people to be free to say "gay people are ok" to make the progress we've made, even though it was not a generally acceptable thought several decades ago.

Infact, the only ideas I’m afraid of letting people say are the ones that I thinkmay be true and that I don’t like.  But I accept that censorship is notgoing to make the world be the way I wish it were.

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

言论自由 创新 旧金山 政治正确性
相关文章