TechCrunch News 02月02日
X expands lawsuit over advertiser ‘boycott’ to include Lego, Nestlé, Pinterest, and others
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

X(原Twitter)因指控广告商非法抵制,扩大了反垄断诉讼范围。最初起诉世界广告商联盟及其品牌安全倡议GARM,后GARM被解散。X认为GARM组织了对Twitter的广告抵制,迫使其遵守其品牌安全标准,导致X广告收入大幅下降,价格远低于竞争对手。尽管X声称其品牌安全符合行业标准,但许多GARM关联广告商停止或减少了在X上的广告支出。目前,X的广告收入主要来自非GARM成员的中小型企业。X的经营状况不佳,用户增长停滞,收入平平,勉强实现盈亏平衡。

📢 X(原Twitter)发起反垄断诉讼,指控世界广告商联盟(WFA)及其品牌安全倡议GARM组织广告抵制,旨在迫使X遵守GARM标准。

📉 GARM解散后,X扩大诉讼范围,将包括雀巢、雅培、高露洁、乐高等多家知名广告商列为被告,指控其参与了对X的抵制行动,导致X广告收入大幅下降。

💰 X声称,尽管其品牌安全符合或超过行业标准,但抵制行为导致X的广告价格远低于竞争对手,使得广告商错失了低价购买广告的机会。

📊 X的诉讼文件显示,其收入主要来自非GARM成员的中小型企业,而抵制行为直接导致X的广告需求和价格下降,经营状况不容乐观。

X is now suing more advertisers in an antitrust lawsuit focusing on what the company’s CEO Linda Yaccarino has claimed is a “systematic illegal boycott.”

The company formerly known as Twitter first filed the lawsuit against the World Federation of Advertisers and its brand safety initiative known as the Global Alliance of Responsible Media in August 2024.

Shortly afterwards, the WFA discontinued GARM, writing that “recent allegations that unfortunately misconstrue its purpose and activities have caused a distraction and significantly drained its resources and finances.” At the same time, the organization’s CEO reportedly told members that it would fight the lawsuit and “demonstrate our full adherence to competition rules in all our activities.”

X subsequently added advertisers including Twitch as defendants in the suit. Now, as initially reported by Business Insider, an amended complaint has expanded the suit even further to include Nestlé, Abbott Laboratories, Colgate, Lego, Pinterest, Tyson Foods, and Shell.

The complaint alleges that the WFA “organized an advertiser boycott of Twitter through GARM, with the goal of coercing Twitter to comply with the GARM Brand Safety Standards to the satisfaction of GARM.” And it claims that these efforts succeeded in harming Twitter/X, with “at least” 18 GARM-affiliated advertisers stopping their purchase of ads on Twitter between November and December 2022, with other advertisers “substantially” reducing their spending.

“The majority of X’s advertising revenue today comes from small- and medium-sized businesses that are not GARM members or clients of GARM-member advertising agencies,” the complaint says. “As demand for advertising on X has declined as a result of the boycott, the price X’s remaining advertisers are willing to pay has declined as well.”

In fact, the lawsuit claims that ad prices on X “remain well below those charged by X’s closest competitors in the social media advertising market,” so “by refraining from purchasing advertising from X, boycotting advertisers are forgoing a valuable opportunity to purchase low-priced advertising inventory on a platform with brand safety that meets or exceeds industry standards.”

The lawsuit isn’t the only place where executives have offered a pessimistic assessment of X’s business. The company’s owner Elon Musk reportedly told employees in January that “user growth is stagnant, revenue is unimpressive, and we’re barely breaking even.”

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

X 反垄断 广告抵制 GARM 品牌安全
相关文章