Replacing conventional building materials with alternatives that sequester carbon dioxide could allow the world to lock away up to half the CO2 generated by humans each year – about 16 billion tonnes. This is the finding of researchers at the University of California Davis and Stanford University, both in the US, who studied the sequestration potential of materials such as carbonate-based aggregates and biomass fibre in brick.
Despite efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by decarbonizing industry and switching to renewable sources of energy, it is likely that humans will continue to produce significant amounts of CO2 beyond the target “net zero” date of 2050. Carbon storage and sequestration – either at source or directly from the atmosphere – are therefore worth exploring as an additional route towards this goal. Researchers have proposed several possible ways of doing this, including injecting carbon underground or deep under the ocean. However, all these scenarios are challenging to implement practically and pose their own environmental risks.
Modifying common building materials
In the present work, a team of civil engineers and earth systems scientists led by Elisabeth van Roijen (then a PhD student at UC Davis) calculated how much carbon could be stored in modified versions of several common building materials. These include concrete (cement) and asphalt containing carbonate-based aggregates; bio-based plastics; wood; biomass-fibre bricks (from waste biomass); and biochar filler in cement.
The researchers obtained the “16 billion tonnes of CO2” figure by assuming that all aggregates currently employed in concrete would be replaced with carbonate-based versions. They also supplemented 15% of cement with biochar and the remainder with carbonatable cements; increased the amount of wood used in all new construction by 20%; and supplemented 15% of bricks with biomass and the remainder with carbonatable calcium hydroxide. A final element in their calculation was to replace all plastics used in construction today with bio-based plastics and all bitumen with bio-oil in asphalt.
“We calculated the carbon storage potential of each material based on the mass ratio of carbon in each material,” explains van Roijen. “These values were then scaled up based on 2016 consumption values for each material.”
“The sheer magnitude of carbon storage is pretty impressive”
While the production of some replacement materials would need to increase to meet the resulting demand, van Roijen and colleagues found that resources readily available today – for example, mineral-rich waste streams – would already let us replace 10% of conventional aggregates with carbonate-based ones. “These alone could store 1 billion tonnes of CO2,” she says. “The sheer magnitude of carbon storage is pretty impressive, especially when you put it in context of the level of carbon dioxide removal needed to stay below the 1.5 and 2 °C targets set by The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).”
Indeed, even if the world doesn’t implement these technologies until 2075, we could still store enough carbon between 2075 and 2100 to stay below these targets, she tells Physics World. “This is assuming, of course, that all other decarbonization efforts outlined in the IPCC reports are also implemented to achieve net-zero emissions,” she says.
Building materials are a good option for carbon storage
The motivation for the study, she explains, came from the urgent need – as expressed by the IPCC – to not only reduce new carbon emissions through rapid and significant decarbonization, but to also remove large amounts of CO2 already present in the atmosphere. “Rather than burying it in geological, terrestrial or ocean reservoirs, we wanted to look into the possibility of leveraging existing technology – namely conventional building materials – as a way to store CO2. Building materials are a good option for carbon storage given the massive quantity (30 billion tonnes) produced each year, not to mention their durability.”
Van Roijen, who is now a postdoctoral researcher at the US Department of Energy Renewable Energy Laboratory, hopes that this work, which is detailed in Science, will go beyond the reach of the research lab and attract the attention of policymakers and industrialists. While some of the technologies outlined in this study are new and require further research, others, such as bio-based plastics, are well established and simply need some economic and political support, she says. “That said, conventional building materials such as concrete and plastics are pretty cheap, so there will need to be some incentive for industries to make the switch over to these low-carbon materials.”
The post Alternative building materials could store massive amounts of carbon dioxide appeared first on Physics World.
