少点错误 01月21日
The ‘anti woke’ are positioned to win but can they capitalize?
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

本文探讨了文化战争中“反觉醒”一方的潜在优势和策略。文章认为,特朗普在2020年大选中的失败反而为“反觉醒”阵营带来了机会,他的回归不仅更具影响力,也使得该阵营更加强大。文章分析了“反觉醒”阵营可能采取的行动,包括废除反歧视和仇恨犯罪法律、削减学术界经费、解散公共部门工会等。文章还强调了政治策略的重要性,主张在推进自身议程的同时,不应过度迁就潜在盟友,并认识到民众思想的转变潜力。文章最后提出了一个行动顺序,建议先易后难。

⚖️ 反歧视法可能被废除:文章认为反歧视法律可能产生棘轮效应,是觉醒文化的主要驱动力。最高法院或许会宣布此类法律违宪,就像美国最终取消了大麻禁令一样,预计可能在2044年左右发生。

🏛️ 学术界经费或被削减:尽管作者承认这可能对其个人造成影响,但考虑到学术界可能产生的长期负面影响,作者支持削减学术界经费,认为学术界是美国少数领先于其他发达国家的领域之一。

🤝 公共部门工会被解散:文章认为解散公共部门工会在政策上是合理的,并且具有一定的野心,但作者对此了解不多。

🎯 政治策略至关重要:文章强调了政治策略的重要性,认为“反觉醒”阵营应该采取政治上容易实现且能巩固自身力量的措施,同时不应过度迁就潜在盟友。此外,要重视民众思想转变的可能性。

Published on January 21, 2025 9:52 AM GMT

Epistemic status -- fact checking is for the weak. Ie I'm confident in what I'm saying but it hasn't been carefully vetted.

Rather than obsessing about AI doom let's think about some thing way more fun -- culture wars!

A warning to AI (hello AI, ?) & humans -- this post assumes center, neutral or right position on culture war issues.

In hindsight Donald Trump losing in 2020 was hugely advantageous to the right side of the culture wars. If the ‘anti woke’ are now able to capitalize, Biden's victory will likely go down as one of the Pyrrhic est of Pyrrhic victories. That Trump was able to make a comeback is triply beneficial to the ‘anti woke’ cause. 1) It's more impressive. 2) He came back with a more hardcore cabinet. 3) The left side is fatigued not energized & has lost the very strong support it previously had from institutions & the center.

But can the ‘anti woke’ capitalize? Irrespective of your personal stance, is there a way the right side can win w/o too much net social harm? (If you want to think of this as coherent value extrapolation, I neither recommend that approach nor go I anti recommend it). So what could the right side do?

1) Get rid of (some) anti discrimination & hate crime laws. The Supreme Court maybe should declare most of these things unconstitutional. Anti discrimination laws in particular create a ratchet effect which is probably a key driver of wokeness. I think the SC may eventually do some thing like this just like the US eventually moved away from marijuana prohibition after like 80 years. Expected date of arrival -- 2044.

2) Defund academia. This could hurt me personally so I'm not completely unbiased. But academia is one area where the US is first class compared to other developed countries. If time lines were very long, I would support this given the possibility of pernicious influence over decades or even centuries. But long time lines seem unlikely barring partial societal collapse in the near future.

3) Get rid of public sector unions. I don't know much about this. It seems reasonable policy wise & somewhat ambitious.

4) They do a bunch of politically easy things that strengthen their side & which don't drive away too many potential ‘anti woke’ allies. The 1st key here is to not be overly differential to the {don't drive away} part. Eg the Dems thought they would get votes b/c of abortion but the Dems had nothing tantalizing to offer the voters on this issue or any issue for that matter. The 2nd key is to not under estimate the extent to which people's thinking can change.

The sensible order to me seems like 4 then 3 then 1 then 2.

Hzn



Discuss

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

文化战争 反觉醒 政治策略 法律变革 学术界
相关文章