TechCrunch News 01月19日
Once high-flying proptech startups Divvy Homes and EasyKnock are the latest to struggle
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

在低利率时代兴起的地产科技初创公司正面临困境。由于房地产科技投资大幅下降,许多公司正在出售或倒闭。Divvy Homes被Maymont Homes收购,而EasyKnock则突然关闭,并面临多起诉讼和消费者警示。这些公司的失败与高利率环境、融资困难以及商业模式的缺陷有关。Divvy Homes的商业模式是购买房屋并将其出租给租户,而EasyKnock则为信用不佳的房主提供快速现金,但高利率限制了它们购房和盈利的能力。此外,EasyKnock还被指控使用欺骗性手段,导致其最终破产。

📉 **融资寒冬**:美国房地产初创公司的投资额从2021年的111亿美元骤降至去年的37亿美元,融资环境恶化导致许多公司面临生存危机。

🏠 **商业模式受阻**:Divvy Homes和EasyKnock都采用购买房屋并出租的模式,但高利率使得购房成本上升,利润空间被压缩,导致商业模式难以维持。

⚖️ **法律与监管风险**:EasyKnock面临超过20起诉讼,并被指控使用“欺骗性手段”低价收购房产并收取高额租金,这对其声誉和运营造成了严重损害。

💸 **债务缠身**:EasyKnock因债务缠身而破产,而Divvy Homes也因多次裁员而陷入困境,这些都反映了高利率和融资困难对公司的负面影响。

Many proptech startups, born and funded during the low-interest-rate heydays, are in the throes of struggle. With investments into U.S.-based real estate startups falling from $11.1 billion in 2021 to $3.7 billion last year, according to PitchBook data, some are selling themselves off, while others are closing shop.

The two most recent examples are the latest casualties of a challenging interest rate environment and the years-long slowdown in real estate fintech funding.

Rent-to-own proptech startup Divvy Homes is being acquired in a fire sale by Charleston, South Carolina-based Maymont Homes, Fast Company reported last week. Maymont is a division of Brookfield Properties. 

EasyKnock abruptly shut down, NPR reported last month. This closure followed several lawsuits filed against the proptech company and an FTC consumer alert about its controversial sale-leaseback models, which involved buying homes from the owners and simultaneously leasing the homes back to them.

While 9-year-old Divvy declined comment, a source familiar with the matter confirmed to TechCrunch that Divvy is having conversations with Brookfield and is “close to signing a purchase agreement.” This person disputed that the acquisition was a fire sale. However, neither the company nor the source shared how much Brookfield could pay for Divvy, so it’s not yet clear if the price is a bargain or a boon.

Its sale, fire or not, isn’t entirely a shock. Signs of trouble began appearing at Divvy in 2022, when the company began laying off staff. By November 2023, Divvy had conducted its third layoff in a year’s time.

The once-buzzy startup had raised more than $700 million in debt and equity from well-known investors such as Tiger Global Management, GGV Capital, and Andreessen Horowitz (a16z), among others. Divvy’s last known funding occurred in August 2021 — a $200 million Series D funding led by Tiger Global Management and Caffeinated Capital at a $2 billion valuation. The Series D round was announced just six months after a $110 million Series C. Divvy Homes’ last known valuation was $2.3 billion in 2021, according to PitchBook.

EasyKnock, a startup that billed itself as the first tech-enabled residential sale-leaseback provider, was founded in 2016 and had raised $455 million in funding from backers, including Blumberg Capital, QED Investors, and Northwestern Mutual’s corporate venture arm, according to PitchBook data. Approximately $200 million of that capital was in a form of debt that allowed the company to buy the homes, according to a person familiar with the startup.

So what went wrong?

In its heyday, Divvy Homes claimed to be different from other real estate tech companies because it worked with renters who wanted to become homeowners by buying the home they wanted and renting it back to them for three years while they built “the savings needed to own it themselves,” it said.

But the Federal Reserve began raising interest rates in 2022 on a mission to curb inflation. For companies like Divvy Homes, which purchased homes as part of its business model, high rates were devastating, limiting its ability to purchase homes and make money off those buys.

EasyKnock’s business model also involved buying homes and renting them. But its arrangement attracted homeowners with poor credit scores because it gave them access to quick cash, along with the option to repurchase the home at a future date.

High interest rates also hurt it, as it took on debt to finance its operations, sources familiar with the company told TechCrunch. But EasyKnock had additional problems. More than two dozen lawsuits were filed against EasyKnocks, and Michigan attorney general alleged that the company used “deceptive practices” by purchasing homes from those in financial stress at low prices and then charging them high rents. 

According to our sources, EasyKnock was insolvent when it shut down, overburdened by debt. 

And with interest rates still relatively high, and funding still difficult to come by, we can likely expect more of this type of news from the real estate fintech space in the coming months and perhaps for all of 2025.

Are you aware of a proptech startup in trouble? Contact Mary Ann at maryann@techcrunch.com or via Signal at 408.204.3036 or Marina.temkin at techcrunch.com.

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

地产科技 初创公司 融资 高利率 商业模式
相关文章