少点错误 01月10日
How do you decide to phrase predictions you ask of others? (and how do you make your own?)
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

本文探讨了在询问他人关于未来事件发生可能性时,如何措辞以获得反映真实意图的答案。文章通过虚构的总统选举案例,分析了不同提问方式可能引发的不同理解,并强调了提问措辞对获取准确预测的重要性。文章进一步深入探讨了如何生成预测的原因,并鼓励读者分享内部思考过程。文章旨在帮助读者更有效地提出预测性问题,并理解预测背后的思考逻辑。

🤔 提问方式影响答案:同一个问题,不同的措辞会引导出不同的关注点,例如询问“是否当选”和“赢得多少选票”侧重点不同。

🧐 背景信息干扰判断:在特定背景下(如间谍丑闻),提问的含义会变得模糊,可能涉及丑闻影响、民众认知或支持者态度等多个层面。

💡 预测应关注内部思考:预测不仅是给出结果,更重要的是理解预测者如何生成答案,包括他们的第一反应和问题分解过程。

Published on January 10, 2025 2:44 AM GMT

I'd like your practical advice and learned experience: how do you go about phrasing predictions when you ask people "Is X going to happen?" - in order to get answers that reflect the actual thing you're trying to get a read on?

Now I'll use a fictitious country with a fictious sitting president running for reelection - let's say I ask for the likelihood of:

 "Will Sum Bodee[1] win the Ruritania Presidential Election this year?"

Even this isn't as straight forward as it seems because it could be motivated by either
a. a desire to know if he will remain President of Ruritania for whatever reason
b. a desire to know what do the people you're asking believe will be the outcome of the election, because you're not interested in the actual administration of the country, but you're interested in sentiment.

See what happens when I ask an intimately related question:

 "How many votes will Sum Bodee win in the Ruritania Presidential Election this year?" 

I think (and if you disagree - please speak up!) this makes it much more clear that the emphasis is less on "who will run the country?" but more on "who do people think will run the country?". Let me imagine some context, let's say that Ruritania was recently caught up in a spying scandal where the equally fictitious country of Buranda was caught red handed spying on members of Bodee's inner cabinet. Now this is where I get confused, because I feel like the phrasing I've given could be asking many different things in this context:

a. what is the impact of the spying scandal on Bodee's electability?
b. what do people think is the impact of the spying scandal, and how influential do they think topics like that are?
c. maybe I'm aware of some other scandals or issues, and curious about the awareness of people about them
d. Maybe I'm posing the question to Bodee loyalists and want to see if the scandal has changed their optimism at all?

And so on and so on... any given phrasing could have multiple intentions - so how do you match the intention to the right prediction?

Indeed, how should you format the prediction is an indication of what you want to know: how do you decide which format to choose?

I wonder if in fact I'm asking this question the wrong way around: perhaps I should come up with an example of a prediction I'd like to make, such as "How many music video commissions will I get this year?" and then ask "Is this how you would pose that prediction?" - Note! I'm not asking you to predict how many commissions I will get - I'm asking: how should I pose the question (to myself).

HOW DO YOU MAKE A PREDICTION

And that's just posing the question. 

Being the start of the year there recently were a few prediction threads . and while the 'reasons' one states for giving a certain level of confidence are one thing, I would very much like to learn how to generate those reasons - how to get there. How do you do it? For example, put yourself on the other end of the prediction questions above - is this you?
 

"hmmm... yes, there are some interesting candidates running against Mr. Bodee in the Ruritanian presidential race this year? I wonder how many votes they will take from him?

Or not!? More generally when you're asked a question like "How much do you expect [politician's name] to win/lose by?" how do you go about generating your response? How do you generate your predictions?

What is your first instinct? How do you break down this question? I'm not looking for references or instructions. I'm looking for narratives of internal thought processes. How it looks like in practice.

 

  1. ^

    Sorry about the lazy fake name. I'm alluding to an old political axiom “You can’t beat somebody with nobody” which I understand to mean that a personality or figure will always beat out even a well intended policy that can't be sold politically with a particular personality. Indeed, it seemed like it would be more effective to pose an example with a fake name and a fake country than to use nondescript variables.



Discuss

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

预测提问 提问技巧 思考过程
相关文章