TechCrunch News 01月08日
Microsoft rolls back its Bing Image Creator model after users complain of degraded quality
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

微软称升级Bing Image Creator的AI模型,但新模型未达预期,遭用户抱怨。许多用户表示新模型生成的图像质量差、不真实且缺乏细节,微软表示将恢复旧模型。此前谷歌也曾因类似问题被迫暂停相关功能,这显示出衡量模型改进的难度。

💥微软升级Bing Image Creator的AI模型,承诺图像生成速度和质量提升

😕新模型未达预期,用户抱怨图像质量差、不真实且缺乏细节

👀微软将恢复旧模型,此前谷歌也有类似问题,凸显衡量模型改进的挑战

Ahead of the holidays, Microsoft said it was upgrading the AI model behind Bing Image Creator, the AI-powered image editing tool built into the company’s Bing search engine. Microsoft promised that the new model — the latest version of OpenAI’s DALL-E 3 model, code-named “PR16” — would allow users to create images “twice as fast as before” with “higher quality.”

But it didn’t deliver. Complaints quickly flooded X and Reddit.

“The DALL-E we used to love is gone forever,” said one Redditor. “I’m using ChatGPT now because Bing has become useless for me,” wrote another.

The blowback was such that Microsoft said it’ll restore the previous model to Bing Image Creator until it can address the issues.

“We’ve been able to [reproduce] some of the issues reported, and plan to revert to [DALL-E 3] PR13 until we can fix them,” Jordi Ribas, head of search at Microsoft, said in a post on X Tuesday evening. “The deployment process is very slow unfortunately. It started over a week ago and will take 2-3 more weeks to get to 100%.”

So what went wrong?

It’s difficult to compare model outputs from anecdotal reports, particularly when the prompts aren’t standardized. But many users said that PR16 tended to make images look less realistic — and “lifeless.” Mayank Parmar, writing for Windows Latest, noted that PR16-generated images lacked detail and polish, and appeared weirdly cartoonish.

It’s not the first time an image model that presumably passed internal checks wasn’t well received publicly. Back in February, Google was forced to pause its AI chatbot Gemini’s ability to create images of people after users complained of historical inaccuracies.

The missteps illustrate just how challenging it can be to measure model improvements in the real world. According to Ribas, Microsoft’s benchmarking found PR16’s quality to be “a bit better on average” compared to the previous Bing Image Creator model.

Whatever internal metric the company used, it seems clear that it didn’t align with most people’s preferences.

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

微软 Bing Image Creator 图像质量 模型改进
相关文章