Contributor 01月07日
Apple Intelligence didn’t write this headline
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

本文Macalope对AI的看法并非一概否定,而是认为它在特定领域有巨大潜力,但目前存在被过度应用和误用的问题。文章指出,AI在处理明确定义的任务和数据集时表现出色,例如提供技术问题的解决方案和代码片段。然而,当AI被用于生成新闻摘要或处理复杂信息时,可能会出现错误,甚至制造虚假信息。尽管如此,AI的长期潜力仍然值得期待,关键在于如何更明智地实施和应用这项技术,避免为了商业利益而滥用。

💡AI在特定领域有显著优势:在处理明确定义的任务和数据集时,AI表现出色,例如提供技术问题的解决方案和代码片段,甚至能帮助解决一些计算机问题。

🚨AI的误用与问题:AI在处理复杂信息或生成新闻摘要时,容易出现错误,例如制造虚假新闻,这反映了AI在某些应用场景下的局限性。

💰AI的滥用倾向:目前,AI常常被过度应用,甚至被强行塞入不需要它的领域,例如AI水龙头。这种现象背后往往是商业利益的驱动。

🔮AI的长期潜力:尽管存在问题,但AI的长期潜力仍然巨大,关键在于如何更明智地实施和应用这项技术,避免为了商业利益而滥用。当AI技术变得像触摸屏一样普及和成熟时,人们可能会更理性地看待和使用它。

Macworld

Today the Macalope comes not to bury AI but to praise it.

Okay, just a little, but still.

Faithful readers of the horny one’s ribald rants might get the sense from them that the Macalope thinks AI should be hurled into the dustbin of history and taken to the garbage dump of the ages to later be burned in the incinerator of perdition. He is here to assure you that his view on AI is far more nuanced than that.

Well, more nuanced. Somewhat. A little more nuanced.

There’s definitely a measurable quantity of nuance to be found. Depending on the precision of the instruments used to do the measuring. The Macalope has not read the standards memos published by the National Board of Nuance and he’s currently unfamiliar with the tools being used in the nuance measuring industry.

They probably have AI in them.

Let’s describe the Macalope’s philosophy on AI as something that works great in certain instances and has great potential that’s being aggressively misused and over-applied.

Despite the potential, there continue to be problems. Like when Apple Intelligence is making up headlines of fake news and passing them around as real notifications.

Look, it’s no big deal, all it did was say that a boxer that lost a bout won and that a former professional tennis player came out as gay when… uh, they had not at all come out as gay in any way.

As if the disinformation age could get any worse, we now have machines churning out random, entirely wrong information on events that it had a 50/50 chance of getting right.

The boxing one. The sexuality one, that’s complicated. Well, maybe there are draws in boxing. There definitely are in sexuality.

[wink]

IDG

(The Macalope doesn’t know what that means, either.)

Whatever the case, we don’t need to worry. Apple is on it! According to the BBC, Apple is “working on a software change to ‘further clarify’ when the notifications are summaries that have been generated by the Apple Intelligence system.”

“This person won a boxing match. (Disclaimer: Apple Intelligence has no idea who won this match, honestly. It’s so tired.)” Fantastic. Problem solved.

Tim Cook loves summaries, by the way. Or so he keeps saying. Not sure which ones he’s reading. Probably not these.

The thing is, while AI does not seem good at these tasks, there are still things it really is good at. They just happen to be defined tasks performed on defined data sets. And how’s someone supposed to get rich off of that?

AI is quite good at providing suggested solutions for technical problems. Ask it for code snippets or how to fix computer problems and it will usually come back with something helpful. Probably still best not to just cut and paste if you’re working on nuclear reactor software, but it’s definitely good enough for web work. Heck, AI has already helped at least one member of the Macalope’s family fix a computer problem without his intervention. If he can get out of the “business” of being free technical support for certain family member, so much the better.

So, is AI without merit? Quite the contrary. It’s incredibly useful… in certain, defined instances. But it should be being implemented more judiciously and not being summarily shoved into everything. Your faucet, for example, does not need AI.

To let you know how crazy that is, the Macalope just typed “ai faucet” into DuckDuckGo and was 100 percent sure he’d get a hit without having looked previously.

Also, just gonna throw it out there based on the second search he did: can someone hack these AI-powered caddies sometime soon? The Macalope really needs to see the video of golfers being chased across the fairway by them. Preferably set to “Yakety Sax”. TIA.

To highlight one of the problems with AI, these are billed as AI-powered “golf carts”, but that’s not what they are. You ride in golf carts. Because these just carry your clubs, they’re replacements for caddies, not carts. If caddies were unionized, “AI-powered scabs” would be more correct than “AI-powered golf carts”. So much of AI revolves around how to put someone out of a job.

It’s also just easy to make fun of AI. When the fruit is so low and so wonderfully ripe, what’s a mythical beast to do?

Okay, okay. The Macalope was going to say nice things about AI today. He does see great potential in AI long-term. The problem is less AI than it is the people trying to ram it into everything to make a buck. When it becomes clear what is going to work and what isn’t–basically when the technology becomes as boring as touch screens and tapping to pay for something–maybe we can enjoy it more.

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

AI 技术滥用 信息失真 技术潜力
相关文章