MarkTechPost@AI 01月07日
Enhancing Clinical Diagnostics with LLMs: Challenges, Frameworks, and Recommendations for Real-World Applications
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

文章探讨了大型语言模型(LLMs)在临床诊断中的应用潜力,尤其是在改善医患互动方面。传统病史采集面临诸多挑战,如患者增多、就诊时间缩短等,这影响了诊断准确性。LLMs通过详细的交互对话,可以收集全面的患者病史,辅助诊断,尤其在远程医疗和急诊中。然而,LLMs的实际应用能力仍需验证。研究人员开发了CRAFT-MD框架,通过模拟医患对话评估LLMs的诊断准确性、病史采集能力和推理能力。评估发现,LLMs在会话环境中的表现不如结构化考试,强调需要更真实的测试方法,如开放式问题和综合病史采集。

🩺 LLMs在临床诊断中的应用旨在改善医患互动,通过详细对话收集病史,辅助诊断,尤其在远程医疗和急诊中。

🔬 CRAFT-MD框架通过模拟医患对话评估临床LLMs,包括诊断准确性、病史采集和推理能力,对比了文本和多模态LLMs的表现。

🗣️ 研究发现,LLMs在会话环境中的表现显著不如结构化考试,表明需要更真实的测试方法,如开放式问题和综合病史采集。

🖼️ 研究强调未来评估应整合多模态数据、持续评估,并优化提示策略,以提高LLMs在临床诊断中的可靠性,确保可扩展性和减少偏差。

Using LLMs in clinical diagnostics offers a promising way to improve doctor-patient interactions. Patient history-taking is central to medical diagnosis. However, factors such as increasing patient loads, limited access to care, brief consultations, and the rapid adoption of telemedicine—accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic—have strained this traditional practice. These challenges threaten diagnostic accuracy, underscoring the need for solutions that enhance the quality of clinical conversations.

Generative AI, particularly LLMs, can address this issue through detailed, interactive conversations. They have the potential to collect comprehensive patient histories, assist with differential diagnoses, and support physicians in telehealth and emergency settings. However, their real-world readiness remains insufficiently tested. While current evaluations focus on multiple-choice medical questions, there is limited exploration of LLMs’ capacity for interactive patient communication. This gap highlights the need to assess their effectiveness in enhancing virtual medical visits, triage, and medical education.

Researchers from Harvard Medical School, Stanford University, MedStar Georgetown University, Northwestern University, and other institutions developed the Conversational Reasoning Assessment Framework for Testing in Medicine (CRAFT-MD). This framework evaluates clinical LLMs like GPT-4 and GPT-3.5 through simulated doctor-patient conversations, focusing on diagnostic accuracy, history-taking, and reasoning. It addresses the limitations of current models and offers recommendations for more effective and ethical LLM evaluations in healthcare.

The study evaluated both text-only and multimodal LLMs using medical case vignettes. The text-based models were assessed with 2,000 questions from the MedQA-USMLE dataset, which included various medical specialties and additional questions on dermatology. The NEJM Image Challenge dataset, which consists of image-vignette pairs, was used for multimodal ev. MELD analysis was used to identify potential dataset contamination by comparing model responses to test questions. A grader-AI and medical experts assessed the clinical LLMs interacted with simulated patient-AI agents and their diagnostic accuracy. Different conversational formats and multiple-choice questions were used to evaluate model performance.

The CRAFT-MD framework evaluates clinical LLMs’ conversational reasoning during simulated doctor-patient interactions. It includes four components: the clinical LLM, a patient-AI agent, a grader-AI agent, and medical experts. The framework tests the LLM’s ability to ask relevant questions, synthesize information, and provide accurate diagnoses. A conversational summarization technique was developed, transforming multi-turn conversations into concise summaries and improving model accuracy. The study found that accuracy decreased significantly when transitioning from multiple-choice to free-response questions, and conversational interactions generally underperformed compared to vignette-based tasks, highlighting the challenges of open-ended clinical reasoning.

Despite demonstrating proficiency in medical tasks, clinical LLMs are often evaluated using static assessments like multiple-choice questions (MCQs), failing to capture real-world clinical interactions’ complexity. Using the CRAFT-MD framework, the evaluation found that LLMs performed significantly worse in conversational settings than structured exams. We recommend shifting to more realistic testing, such as dynamic doctor-patient conversations, open-ended questions, and comprehensive history-taking to reflect clinical practice better. Additionally, integrating multimodal data, continuous evaluation, and improving prompt strategies are crucial for advancing LLMs as reliable diagnostic tools, ensuring scalability, and reducing biases across diverse populations.


Check out the Paper. All credit for this research goes to the researchers of this project. Also, don’t forget to follow us on Twitter and join our Telegram Channel and LinkedIn Group. Don’t Forget to join our 60k+ ML SubReddit.

FREE UPCOMING AI WEBINAR (JAN 15, 2025): Boost LLM Accuracy with Synthetic Data and Evaluation IntelligenceJoin this webinar to gain actionable insights into boosting LLM model performance and accuracy while safeguarding data privacy.

The post Enhancing Clinical Diagnostics with LLMs: Challenges, Frameworks, and Recommendations for Real-World Applications appeared first on MarkTechPost.

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

LLMs 临床诊断 CRAFT-MD 医患互动 AI评估
相关文章