Mashable 2024年12月13日
Rising use of generative AI by police is a threat to Americans civil liberties, ACLU warns
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

ACLU发布白皮书,对警方日益依赖人工智能表示担忧。指出热门生成式AI技术的应用,如协助警察写报告的工具,对美国公民自由构成威胁。多个警局已测试相关AI工具,专家批评该技术,ACLU强调其存在诸多问题并提出建议。

🎯ACLU发布白皮书警告AI技术对公民自由的威胁

🚓警方使用如Draft One等AI工具协助写报告

👁️专家批评AI技术应用,ACLU强调其诸多问题

💡ACLU建议AI应在人类记忆记录后使用

The ACLU is sounding the alarm on the nation's police forces increasingly leaning on artificial intelligence.

In a six-page white paper released Dec. 10, the nation's largest civil rights group warns that the implementation of popular generative AI tech, like chatbots and drafting tools, is an overstep of technological advancement and poses a threat to American civil liberties.

The organization specifically singles out the use of Draft One, a controversial generative AI tool that assists police officers in drafting reports based on body cam audio and relies on OpenAI's GPT-4 model. Several police departments around the nation have gradually tested AI tools over the last year, including Draft One. That number is on the rise, with cities around the U.S. pitching generative AI features as a solution to budget and staffing constraints.

Experts have criticized the implementation of this tech, citing the essential role police reports play across judicial decision making, from investigation and discovery to sentencing.

"The forcing function of writing out a justification, and then swearing to its truth, and publicizing that record to other legal professionals (prosecutors/judges) is a check on police power," wrote law expert Andrew Guthrie Ferguson in one of the first law reviews of AI-drafted police reports. The report is cited by the ACLU in its white paper.

The ACLU outlines four major areas of concern in its white paper, including the necessary accountability process of human-written reports Ferguson describes. In its analysis, the organization emphasizes the uncertainty stoked by biases and hallucinations inherent to the tech itself, and questions the transparency of these processes to the public at large — not to mention its data privacy implications. According to the organization, relying more on the interpretation of generative AI tools than human memory and a police officer's subjective observations is to the detriment of a fair judicial process.

If AI is the next frontier for police officers, the ACLU urges, it should be used only after human memory has been recorded. AI tools could transcribe audio-recorded verbal narratives created by the officers involved, the organization explains, which could be submitted in tandem for review.

But, contrary to the recommendations of civil rights groups, AI's leaders are steadily investing in police and military applications of their technology.

"Police reports play a crucial role in our justice system. They are central to the criminal proceedings that determine people’s innocence, guilt, and punishment, and are often the only official account of what took place during a particular incident," the ACLU writes. "AI report-writing technology removes important human elements from police procedures and is too new, too untested, too unreliable, too opaque, and too biased to be inserted into our criminal justice system."

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

ACLU 人工智能 警方 公民自由
相关文章