Cogito Tech 2024年11月26日
The Human Element: Roles in Training and Fine-Tuning LLMs
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

大型语言模型(LLM)和生成式AI的兴起,扩展了人工智能在各行各业的应用潜力,但也引发了关于人类在训练过程中扮演的角色的思考。尽管LLM在某些任务中变得更加自主,但其有效性、安全性以及与人类偏好和价值观的契合度仍然需要人类的指导、监督和干预。本文探讨了人类在训练和微调LLM中的作用,以确保其道德和有益的部署,涵盖数据收集、标注、质量检查、偏差缓解、伦理以及人类反馈强化学习等方面,并举例说明Cogito公司如何利用其专业知识助力LLM的训练和微调。

🤔**数据收集与准备:**人类在训练LLM的过程中扮演着至关重要的角色,包括选择相关数据集、设计协议,以及确保数据的多样性和代表性。此外,还需要对收集到的数据进行清洗和预处理,以去除噪音、不一致性和错误,为模型训练做好准备。

🧑‍🏫**数据标注与注释:**人类标注者在监督学习任务中发挥着关键作用,例如情感分析,因为机器难以处理微妙的情感细微差别或上下文含义。标注者还可以帮助改进训练数据,识别和去除噪音和错误,从而增强模型的可靠性。

⚖️**质量检查、偏差缓解和伦理:**在整个LLM生命周期中,人类参与对于确保质量、公平性和道德标准至关重要。人类可以识别和纠正错误或不一致性,解决偏差,并制定指南和规则,以确保使用和输出符合道德和法律标准。

🔄**人类反馈强化学习(RLHF):**RLHF是通过人类提供的反馈来训练模型的过程。人类评估者与预训练模型互动,并根据输出质量提供排名。这些排名随后被转换为数值奖励信号,并集成到强化学习框架中,以改进模型未来的结果。

🛡️**偏差缓解和内容审核:**人类参与对于偏差缓解和内容审核至关重要。人类专家设计和实施策略来识别和减少系统性错误,分析训练数据以确保其公平性和包容性。同时,人类在制定内容审核标准、识别和处理不同类型的内容方面发挥着关键作用。

The advent of large language models (LLMs) and generative AI has expanded the potential of Artificial Intelligence (AI) across various industries and applications. These models are more autonomous and less reliant on human supervision. This development raises a critical question, what role do humans play in training large language models?

LLMs have become more autonomous in certain tasks, but their effectiveness, safety, and alignment with human preferences and values still require a degree of reliance on human guidance, oversight, and intervention. This article explores the human element in training and fine-tuning LLMs to ensure their ethical and beneficial deployment.

The Human Factor in Training LLMs

Despite advances in automation, human involvement is crucial in training LLMs. From selecting relevant datasets and designing protocols to preventing models from learning biases in the data and ensuring alignment with ethical standards and societal norms, human expertise is indispensable.

Data Collection and Preparation

Training data is the foundation of any LLM. Data collection is an important aspect of the training process, involving humans who carefully choose data sources and ensure the data is diverse and representative. The collected data then needs to be prepared for training, where the workforce of humans cleans and preprocesses it to remove noise, inconsistencies, and errors.

Data Labeling and Annotation

The effectiveness of output generated by LLMs heavily depends on data labeling or annotation. Human labelers play a critical role in supervised learning tasks that require nuanced human comprehension, like sentiment analysis since machines often struggle with subtle emotional nuances or contextual meanings. Annotators also help refine training data by identifying and removing noise and errors, which strengthens the reliability of the model. The annotated data serves as a single source of truth that can be used to compare metrics like precision, recall, or F1 scores of different models.

Quality Check, Bias Mitigation and Ethics

Beyond the training process, human involvement is essential throughout the LLM lifecycle to ensure quality, fairness, and ethical standards. Humans can identify and correct errors or inconsistencies, address biases, and develop guidelines and rules to ensure that usage and output comply with ethical and legal standards.

Fine-Tuning Large Language Models

Despite their increasing sophistication, human expertise is crucial for fine-tuning and guiding these models. Humans with specialized domain knowledge make key decisions to align the model with the specific field or application. They make decisions about various technical aspects, such as model architecture, loss functions, and other hyperparameters, to optimize a model’s performance. Additionally, they handle edge cases that were not covered in the training data the model learned from, guiding the model to deal with such scenarios effectively. Humans are also responsible for overseeing the creation of ground truth labels for a dataset that is used as a benchmark for evaluating the model’s performance.

Once the initial training and fine-tuning are completed, the human workforce is responsible for testing and validating the model’s output for quality, relevance, and appropriateness. Depending on the results, they might adjust the model’s parameters or further fine-tune it through supervised fine-tuning to meet required standards or purposes.

Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback

Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) as the name suggests is the process of training a model from human-provided feedback. Human evaluators interact with a pre-trained model and provide rankings based on quality of outputs. These rankings are then converted into numerical reward signals and integrated into the reinforcement learning framework to improve the model’s results in the future. Real-world interactions and feedback help models continuously learn and improve, reinforcing the essential value of human involvement in training and fine-tuning LLMs.

Ensuring Ethical AI Development
Human involvement is critical to bias mitigation and content moderation:

Bias Mitigation

AI models trained on biased data can generate distorted outputs and potentially harmful outcomes, necessitating the detection and mitigation of bias. Human experts design and implement strategies to identify and reduce such systematic errors. They analyze the training data to ensure it is fair and inclusive, which helps achieve equitable outcomes across demographics and use cases. Addressing bias in AI requires human intervention for detecting bias, modifying algorithms, or applying corrective measures to mitigate its impact.

Content Moderation

AI systems often process massive amounts of content created by humans, which can sometimes include harmful material. As a result, AI models may spread offensive, inappropriate, or harmful content. Humans play a critical role in developing and refining large language models by setting parameters for what constitutes appropriate content and determining sensitivity levels. These evaluators use diverse datasets containing acceptable and unacceptable material to train AI models on how to identify and handle different types of content.

Additionally, by reviewing and correcting errors, humans help refine the model’s algorithms for improved future performance. This feedback loop, or human-AI collaboration, ensures that content moderation is accurate, the model is exposed to different cultures, and it can adapt to the nuanced nature of human communication.

How Cogito Helps in Training and Fine-Tuning LLMs

With over a decade of expertise in data labeling and evaluation, Cogito Tech provides quality training data at scale for LLMs. Our extensive domain expertise, commitment to compliance and transparency, and collaborative approach allow us to customize our solutions to your specific goals. We streamline ML data pipelines with custom workflow automation and employ best-in-class tools for image, video, and NLP data labeling. Our key LLM offerings include model evaluation, RLHF, and red-teaming, along with our own DataSum—a ‘Nutrition Facts’ style framework for AI training data—ensuring your models are robust against potential threats.

We maintain a vast corpus of 1500TB of open-source datasets, including multimodal datasets covering text, speech, image, video, and more. We also have an extensive and diverse range of high-quality data for supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning from human feedback.

The post The Human Element: Roles in Training and Fine-Tuning LLMs appeared first on Cogitotech.

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

大型语言模型 人工智能 人类反馈 数据标注 伦理
相关文章