MarkTechPost@AI 2024年11月24日
Missingness-aware Causal Concept Explainer: An Elegant Explanation by Researchers to Solve Causal Effect Limitations in Black Box Interpretability
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

机器学习模型的可解释性是近年来研究的热点,传统的可解释性方法通常关注模型输入的低级特征,而基于概念的方法则关注图像的高级特征并提取语义信息,从而更好地理解模型的推理过程。然而,现有的因果概念效应方法假设所有相关概念都被完整观测到,这在实际应用中难以满足。本文介绍了一种名为“缺失感知因果概念解释器”(MCCE)的新方法,该方法通过构建与已观测概念正交的伪概念来解决未观测概念对因果解释的影响,从而更准确地评估模型预测结果中不同概念的因果效应。MCCE不仅能够解释单个样本的预测,还能概括神经网络的整体推理过程,并取得了良好的实验效果,展现了其在可解释性方面的潜力。

🤔**基于概念的可解释性方法**:通过将模型表示与人类可理解的概念对齐,解释模型的决策,相比传统方法更具直观吸引力,关注图像的高级特征并提取语义信息,映射到模型内部过程,从而窥探模型推理过程。

💡**因果效应估计**:通过改变不同概念并观察其对模型预测的影响来评估基于概念方法的有效性,这种敏感性分析可以识别改变特定概念如何因果地影响模型的预测。

🚀**缺失感知因果概念解释器(MCCE)**:该框架通过构建与已观测概念正交的伪概念来解决未观测概念对因果解释的影响,弥补了已观测概念中缺失的信息,并使用线性变换从编码的输入数据中创建伪概念向量,最终训练一个包含伪概念和实际概念的线性模型。

📊**实验结果**:MCCE在CEBaB数据集上进行多类语义分类实验,并与其他基线方法进行比较,结果表明MCCE在存在一个或两个未观测概念的情况下,在所有指标上都优于S-Learner,并且在案例研究中也表现出明显的优势。

📚**研究意义**:该研究为解决因果效应在可解释性方面的现有问题提供了一种优雅且有效的方法,MCCE展现了作为可解释预测器的潜力,未来可以进一步验证其准确性和泛化能力。

Concept-based explanations of machine learning applications have a greater intuitive appeal, as established by emerging research as an alternative to traditional approaches. Concept-driven methods explain the decisions of a model by aligning its representation with human understandable concepts. Conventional approaches to ML explainability attribute a model’s behavior to low-level features of the input, whereas concept-based methods examine the high-level features of the image and extract semantic knowledge from it. Further, this semantic information is mapped to the model’s internal processes. This maneuver gives quite a good glimpse into the model’s reasoning process. The efficacy of concept-based methods is assessed with causal effects estimation. It means comparing the outcome by changing various concepts and noting their impact, one at a time. This exercise of sensitivity analysis identifies how altering a specific concept causally influences the model’s predictions. While the causal effect method is gaining prominence, current methods have significant limitations. The existing causal concept effect assumes complete observation of all concepts involved within the dataset, which can fail in practice. In reality, the identification of concepts from data can vary between experts or automated systems, and one or many concepts may only be annotated in part of the dataset. This article discusses the latest research that aims to solve this problem.

Researchers from the University of Wisconsin-Madison propose a framework named “Missingness-aware Causal Concept Explainer “to capture the impact of unobserved concepts in data. They do so by constructing pseudo-concepts that are orthogonal to observed concepts. The authors first perform mathematical experiments to show how unobserved concepts hinder the unbiased estimation of causal explanations. 

The authors model the relationship between concepts and the model’s output with a linear function. MCCE is multi-capable in determining the individual sample’s effects and generalizing the thought process of neural networks while making a rule. Thus, it explains reasoning at both the individual sample level and the aggregate black box. MCCE’s operational strategy is simple: it compensates for the information missed in observed concepts with the help of raw data. Authors create pseudo-concept vectors orthogonal to observed data using linear transformations from encoded input data. A linear model is then trained on pseudo-concepts collectively with actual concepts.

For the experiment, the authors chose the CEBaB dataset. An interesting and noteworthy fact about this dataset is that it is the only dataset with human-verified approximate counterfactual text. They performed multiclass semantic classification by fine-tuning data on three open Large models – base BERT, base RoBERTa, and Llama-3. The results of the experiments validated this research.MCCE outperformed S-Learner overall in all the metrics, with either one or two unobserved concepts. Further, in a case study, MCCE demonstrated a distinct advantage over the baselines when two of the four concepts were unobserved. Besides the robust performance of the proposed idea, MCCE also showed potential as an interpretable predictor.MCCE predictor achieved comparable performance when leveraging BERT and RoBERTa’s hidden states compared to their black-box model counterpart

This research gave an elegant yet effective solution to the existing problem in causal effects for explainability. While including MCCE in fine-tuning made the performance robust, we could further comment on its accuracy and generalizability after validating more data across domains and classes.


Check out the Paper here. All credit for this research goes to the researchers of this project. Also, don’t forget to follow us on Twitter and join our Telegram Channel and LinkedIn Group. If you like our work, you will love our newsletter.. Don’t Forget to join our 55k+ ML SubReddit.

[FREE AI VIRTUAL CONFERENCE] SmallCon: Free Virtual GenAI Conference ft. Meta, Mistral, Salesforce, Harvey AI & more. Join us on Dec 11th for this free virtual event to learn what it takes to build big with small models from AI trailblazers like Meta, Mistral AI, Salesforce, Harvey AI, Upstage, Nubank, Nvidia, Hugging Face, and more.

The post Missingness-aware Causal Concept Explainer: An Elegant Explanation by Researchers to Solve Causal Effect Limitations in Black Box Interpretability appeared first on MarkTechPost.

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

机器学习 可解释性 因果效应 概念解释 黑盒模型
相关文章