Fortune | FORTUNE 2024年11月19日
How Trump can follow through on his campaign promise to stop double-taxing American expats
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

本文探讨了美国公民海外双重征税的问题,指出其对美国公民、美国经济以及其他国家经济的负面影响。文章指出,只有厄立特里亚和朝鲜这两个国家也实行公民身份征税,美国应该废除这一政策,以体现公平原则。双重征税增加了美国公民海外工作和生活的负担,也阻碍了美国企业拓展海外市场。文章呼吁美国政府采取行动,例如实施基于居住地的征税制度,以解决这一问题,并支持总统当选人特朗普履行竞选承诺,废除双重征税。

🤔**双重征税的不公平性:**除了美国、厄立特里亚和朝鲜外,全球其他国家都没有对本国公民的海外收入征税。美国公民在海外工作和生活,不仅要向所在国缴纳税款,还要向美国缴纳税款,这显然不公平。

💼**双重征税对美国经济的负面影响:**双重征税导致美国公民在海外工作和学习的意愿下降,阻碍了美国人才的培养和积累,也限制了美国企业拓展海外市场的机会,不利于美国经济发展。

🌍**双重征税对其他国家的负面影响:**其他国家也从美国公民的海外工作和生活受益,他们带来的专业技能、知识和经验可以弥补当地人才缺口,促进经济发展。双重征税政策则会阻碍美国公民前往这些国家,从而影响这些国家的经济发展。

🗳️**呼吁废除双重征税:**文章呼吁美国政府采取行动废除双重征税,例如实施基于居住地的征税制度,允许美国公民选择只向其居住地缴纳税款。这将有助于鼓励美国公民在海外工作和生活,促进美国经济和全球经济的发展。

✍️**国会行动:**过去几年,国会议员已经提出了多项法案,旨在解决双重征税问题,包括基于居住地的征税制度。文章呼吁新一届国会能够重视这个问题,并采取措施予以解决。

In the final weeks of his campaign, President-elect Donald Trump appealed to an often-overlooked constituency, Americans overseas, with a pledge to end the “double-taxation” of their income. But unlike many Trump campaign talking points, this isn’t a partisan issue. In fact, it’s one with broad cross-aisle support. A coalition of organizations ranging from Democrats Abroad, an arm of the Democratic Party, to the fiscally conservative National Taxpayers Union all support eliminating undue tax burdens on Americans overseas.From a policy perspective, eliminating the current requirement that American expats pay taxes on their foreign income to the United States as well as their country of residence makes perfect sense. Only two other countries require citizenship-based taxation: Eritrea and North Korea. As a simple matter of fairness, no U.S. citizen should be taxed twice. But it’s not just about the IRS bill. Expats also face significantly more paperwork, requiring them to hire professional help that may be hard to afford. Contrary to the stereotype perpetuated by the media, most Americans abroad aren’t living in fancy villas. A majority of Americans abroad have a gross household income of less than $100,000.The tax treatment of income earned overseas also hurts our economy and the economies of our trading partners. While studying and working abroad, Americans acquire skills in all kinds of fields, including finance, natural resources, the sciences, and engineering. When they come home, they bring their new knowledge with them to benefit U.S. enterprises.Many Americans abroad work for U.S. companies—and thus help bolster U.S. businesses expanding into new markets. And many work in jobs that promote trade.Double taxation discourages all these activities. It even encourages some to stay abroad permanently. In fact, nearly one-third of Americans living abroad are either planning to renounce their citizenship or are seriously considering it, according to a recent survey. Of these expats, three in four cited the burden of managing and filing U.S. taxes as a primary motivator. This is sad because people should not feel they have to change their lives and the lives of their families based on taxes.Host countries also benefit from expat U.S. citizens—and are hurt by policies that discourage Americans from living overseas. For one thing, the countries of residence gain talent. American professionals bring diverse skills, knowledge, and perspectives. They fill workforce gaps, contribute to public finances through taxes paid, and provide access to their networks in U.S. markets.Getting rid of double taxation for U.S. citizens abroad isn’t a new idea. In 2018, Rep. George Holding (R-NC) introduced the Tax Fairness for Americans Abroad Act. And in the past few years, Democrats introduced several bills that would transition the United States to a system in which Americans have the option to pay taxes based only on their place of residency, rather than on citizenship. Residency-based taxation (RBT) would not change the way an individual’s U.S. income is taxed, only foreign income. Such a switch wouldn’t require massive redrafting of the Internal Revenue Code—and it needn’t be mandatory for American expats who would rather stick with the current system. According to research we conducted in 2022, residency-based taxation could be adopted without any loss of revenue to the U.S. Treasury.Naturally, members of Congress do not want to vote for something that appeals to billionaires looking for loopholes to avoid paying taxes. So the next Congress could prevent abuses by excluding certain “tax haven” countries from residency-based taxation policies and making a handful of other nip-and-tuck changes. This is an issue of enormous importance to a sizable number of American voters. It’s critical that President Trump follows through on this campaign promise.More must-read commentary published by Fortune:The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.How many degrees of separation are you from the globe's most powerful business leaders? Explore who made our brand-new list of the 100 Most Powerful People in Business. Plus, learn about the metrics we used to make it.

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

双重征税 海外美国公民 居住地征税 税收政策 美国经济
相关文章