Fortune | FORTUNE 2024年10月31日
X’s crowd-sourced ‘Community Notes’ fact checks fail to address flood of U.S. election misinformation, report says
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

据报道,X的社区笔记项目未能解决其平台上大量的美国选举错误信息。该项目虽允许用户进行事实核查,但分析发现,在被认为有误导性的样本帖子中,大部分准确的纠错笔记未被显示。即便有显示的,原误导性帖子的浏览量也远超其伴随的笔记。此外,X曾起诉相关研究该问题的组织,后被法官驳回。

🎯X的社区笔记项目,用户被接受为贡献者后可对帖子进行事实核查,核查结果由其他用户根据准确性、来源、易懂性和语言中立性进行评级。该项目2021年由原Twitter领导推出,后被马斯克改名为社区笔记。

🚫CCDH分析发现,在283个被认为有误导性的帖子样本中,有209个未显示准确的纠错笔记,占比74%。包括声称2020年总统选举被窃取等虚假内容的帖子,即便有可用的社区笔记也未显示。

📈在有社区笔记显示的情况下,原误导性帖子的浏览量是其伴随笔记的13倍。X的副总裁称该项目有数千条与选举和政治相关的笔记通过了高标准审核,且在最近一个月有数百条此类笔记在数千个帖子上显示,被浏览数千万次。

X’s crowd-sourced fact-checking program, called Community Notes, isn’t addressing the flood of U.S. election misinformation on Elon Musk’s social media platform, according to a report published Wednesday by a group that tracks online speech.The nonprofit Center for Countering Digital Hate analyzed the Community Notes feature and found that accurate notes correcting false and misleading claims about the U.S. elections were not displayed on 209 out of a sample of 283 posts deemed misleading — or 74%.Misleading posts that did not display Community Notes even when they were available included false claims that the 2020 presidential election was stolen and that voting systems are unreliable, CCDH said.In the cases where Community Notes were displayed, the original misleading posts received 13 times more views than their accompanying notes, the group added.Community Notes lets X users write fact checks on posts after the users are accepted as contributors to the program. The checks are then rated by other users based on their accuracy, sources, how easily they are to understand, and whether they use neutral language. The program was launched in 2021 by the previous leadership of the site — then known as Twitter — and was called Birdwatch. Musk renamed it Community Notes after he took over the site in 2022.Last year, X sued CCDH, blaming the group for the loss of “tens of millions of dollars” in advertising revenue after it documented an increase in hate speech on the site. The lawsuit was dismissed by a federal judge in March.Keith Coleman, a vice president of product at X who oversees Community Notes, said in a statement that the program “maintains a high bar to make notes effective and maintain trust across perspectives, and thousands of election and politics related notes have cleared that bar in 2024. In the last month alone, hundreds of such notes have been shown on thousands of posts and have been seen tens of millions of times. It is because of their quality that notes are so effective.”San Francisco-based X also pointed to external academic research that has shown Community Notes to be trustworthy and effective.Imran Ahmed, the CEO of CCDH, however, said the group’s research “suggests that X’s Community Notes are little more than a Band Aid on a torrent of hate and disinformation that undermines our democracy and further polarizes our communities.”Recommended newsletter Data Sheet: Stay on top of the business of tech with thoughtful analysis on the industry's biggest names. Sign up here.

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

X平台 社区笔记 美国选举 错误信息
相关文章