Fortune | FORTUNE 2024年10月22日
New American college protest rules are getting big pushback from professors claiming threat to free speech
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

今年秋季,美国高校抗议活动持续升温,不仅学生积极参与,教授们也加入了抗议的行列。随着新的限制措施出台,学生抗议活动受到限制,教授们则挺身而出,为言论自由和思考自由发声,这两种权利是大学生活的重要组成部分。新的抗议规则被视为对学术自由的限制,引发了教授们的强烈不满。一些高校针对去年春天发生的亲巴勒斯坦抗议活动实施了新的限制措施,例如禁止深夜抗议、禁止在校园露营以及要求提前审批标语等。教授们认为这些限制措施限制了学术自由,并认为大学应该是自由言论的堡垒。他们通过抗议、守夜和要求解释等方式,表达了对新规则的不满。一些教授还将抗议限制视为劳工问题,因为近年来高校对教授的终身教职任命越来越少,同时面临着废除终身教职的压力。他们认为,新的抗议规则是行政部门削弱教授在大学事务中的话语权的又一种方式。

🤔 **教授们对新的抗议规则感到担忧,认为这些规则限制了言论自由和思考自由,这两种权利是大学生活的重要组成部分。** 他们认为,大学应该是自由言论的堡垒,任何限制言论自由的行为都是对学术自由的侵犯。教授们还指出,新的抗议规则是近年来高校对学术自由进行限制的一部分,而这背后是反民主势力在作祟。

🤨 **新的抗议规则被视为对学术自由的限制,引发了教授们的强烈不满。** 去年春天,一些高校针对亲巴勒斯坦抗议活动实施了新的限制措施,例如禁止深夜抗议、禁止在校园露营以及要求提前审批标语等。教授们认为这些限制措施不仅限制了学术自由,而且针对了特定的群体,例如亲巴勒斯坦人士。

👨‍🏫 **教授们认为,新的抗议规则也是劳工问题的一部分。** 近年来,高校对教授的终身教职任命越来越少,同时面临着废除终身教职的压力。教授们认为,新的抗议规则是行政部门削弱教授在大学事务中的话语权的又一种方式。他们呼吁教授们团结起来,要求共享治理,拥有审查和挑战这些政策的权利。

📢 **教授们认为,学生有权表达自己的观点,并通过抗议的方式表达自己的不满。** 他们认为,大学应该是一个自由表达和批判性思维的场所,学生有权对他们认为存在问题的议题进行抗议。教授们呼吁大学领导层重视学生的言论自由权利,并为学生提供一个安全的表达平台。

✊ **教授们认为,学术自由和言论自由是大学的核心价值,不能被任何力量所侵蚀。** 他们呼吁教授们团结起来,维护学术自由和言论自由,抵制任何对学术自由和言论自由的限制。

Dissent is thriving this fall at American colleges, and not just among student activists. With student protests limited by new restrictions, faculty have taken up the cause.To faculty, new protest rules threaten freedom of speech — and the freedom to think, both central to university life. This semester, some of the most visible demonstrations have involved professors speaking up for the right to protest itself.Last spring, pro-Palestinian tent encampments crowded schools and disrupted commencement plans, drawing accusations of antisemitism and prompting new limits.At Indiana University, an “expressive activity policy” rolled out in August prohibits protests after 11 p.m., bans camping on campus, and requires pre-approval for signs. In defiance, each Sunday a group of faculty members, students and community members gather on campus for candlelight vigils that extend past the 11 p.m. deadline.Russ Skiba, a professor emeritus who has attended the vigils, said the new restrictions are part of a larger movement to limit academic freedom on campuses.In Indiana, the Republican governor in March signed a law increasing state oversight of public universities. The law, sponsored by a lawmaker who said colleges suffer from “monolithic thinking,” subjects faculty to post-tenure reviews over whether they are fostering diversity of thought and keeping their political views out of the classroom. Skiba and other Indiana professors widely opposed the bill, which they criticized as vague and subject to interpretation.“Universities are bastions of free speech, but when you have a movement that is anti-democratic, one of the places that is most attacked is freedom of speech,” Skiba said.Faculty members at colleges elsewhere around the country have pushed back on the new rules with protests, vigils and demands for explanation.A group of Harvard University professors held a “study-in” at a campus library on Oct. 16 in support of pro-Palestinian students who were temporarily banned from the library for holding a similar demonstration. In September, a group representing University of California faculty filed a complaint alleging the system sought to chill their academic freedom and keep from teaching about the Israel-Hamas war “in a way that does not align with the University’s own position.”To some professors, the protest restrictions are also a labor issue.Colleges have been granting tenure to fewer professors, and facing pressure in some areas to do away with it altogether. Legislatures in several states have taken an interest in how topics around race, gender and history are taught. Protest guidelines handed down by administrators are another way the faculty’s say in university affairs is being diminished, some professors say.“We have to, as faculty, organize and demand the sort of shared governance that gives us a right to review and challenge these policies,” said Todd Wolfson, a journalism and media studies professor at Rutgers University and the president of the American Association of University Professors. “They’re not made by people coming out of the academic arm of our institutions.”Tensions on campuses nationwide have been high since the war began over a year ago, when Hamas-led militants stormed into southern Israel, killing some 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and abducting around 250. Israel’s offensive has killed over 42,000 Palestinians, according to the Gaza Health Ministry, which does not say how many were fighters.Colleges have been under tremendous pressure, including from Republicans in Congress, to protect students from discrimination while upholding free speech. Demonstrations last spring blocked foot traffic in parts of some campuses and included instances of antisemitic imagery and rhetoric. Some Jewish faculty members and students have the protests made them feel unsafe.Shirin Vossoughi, a Northwestern University professor, was among 52 faculty members who signed an open letter opposing the school’s new demonstration policy as caving to political pressure to silence certain types of activism. She said the rules crack down not just on free speech, but pro-Palestinian voices in particular.“A lot of universities have rewritten their demonstration and code of conduct policies this summer, and I think my first thought is that it is very clear that it’s in response to dissent around Palestine,” she said.During the protests last spring, some faculty members joined ranks with demonstrators. Others acted as mediators for students they see as under their care and protection. Faculty voted no confidence against leaders of schools including Columbia University, the University of Massachusetts, Brandeis University, and Cal Poly Humboldt over their handling of the protests.At Northwestern University, Steven Thrasher was among three faculty members charged by university police for obstructing law enforcement during last spring’s protests. He was suspended and removed from teaching this fall while under investigation by the university.“The way that I saw my role was as a protector of the students’ safety and of their ability to express themselves,” Thrasher said this fall. “I knew as soon as I started seeing violence happening towards students that I would do what I could.”While schools say the rules are meant to limit disruptions, faculty members say they have the effect of neutralizing dissent.“The whole point of a protest is to be seen and heard,” said Michael Thaddeus, a mathematics professor at Columbia University, where new rules require advance notice and prevent demonstrations that “substantially inhibit the primary purposes” of an area of campus. “Free speech rights aren’t served if you can only speak into the void and not have anybody hear you, and that includes the right to be seen and heard by people who don’t like what you have to say.”Professors also drew a connection to the growing percentage of lecturers, adjuncts and professors who do not have tenure protections. Professors increasingly see the issue of speech and academic freedom as a labor issue as a result of the crackdowns, said Risa Lieberwitz, AAUP’s general counsel.“We’re seeing unionization growing and increasing,” she said. “I think to some extent it’s because it’s so important to organize, to claim democratic rights.”Wolfson said professors must stand up for students’ rights to demonstrate and speak freely.“Their freedom of speech rights are the lifeblood of the university,” Wolfson said. “We cannot have a university based on critical thinking and exploring questions if we’re going to clamp down on students’ rights to protest something they think is a massive problem, and if they see a way for the university to actually engage in it productively.”

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

学术自由 言论自由 大学 抗议 教授
相关文章