欧盟委员会正在调查X，以确定其是否违反了《数字服务法》。该法规定，如果在线平台未能打击非法内容和虚假信息或遵守透明度规则，欧盟可以对它们处以高达其年度全球收入 6% 的罚款。据知情人士透露，监管机构正在考虑是否将 SpaceX、Neuralink、xAI 和 Boring Company 的销售额计入对 X 的潜在罚款中，这将大大提高违反内容审核规则的潜在处罚。

📈 欧盟委员会正在调查X，以确定其是否违反了《数字服务法》，该法规定，如果在线平台未能打击非法内容和虚假信息或遵守透明度规则，欧盟可以对它们处以高达其年度全球收入 6% 的罚款。

📡 监管机构正在考虑是否将 SpaceX、Neuralink、xAI 和 Boring Company 的销售额计入对 X 的潜在罚款中，这意味着如果 X 被发现违反了《数字服务法》，马斯克可能需要承担更大的责任。

📢 欧盟委员会正在调查 X 的潜在违反《数字服务法》的行为，该法旨在确保平台监管非法内容。欧盟正在领导全球打击有害在线内容和虚假信息的行动，这引发了马斯克越来越强烈的回应，他表示此类措施限制了言论自由。

📣 X 是一家由马斯克完全控制的私人公司。委员会在考虑马斯克其他公司收入时，实际上是在权衡是否应该将马斯克本人视为应处以罚款的实体，而不是 X 本身。

📤 欧盟委员会尚未决定是否对 X 处以罚款，任何潜在罚款的数额仍在讨论中。如果 X 找到方法解决监管机构的担忧，则可能会避免处罚。

📥 X 也将有机会对任何欧盟决定提出质疑，但最终决定权在于委员会。X 未回复寻求评论的请求。马斯克此前在 X 上表示，他将通过“在法庭上进行一场非常公开的斗争”来对抗任何 DSA 罚款。

📦 对 X 的审查始于欧盟前科技主管蒂埃里·布雷顿，他经常在网上与马斯克发生争执，并被授予了在无需委员会批准的情况下执行 DSA 的特殊权力。布雷顿于 9 月辞职后，将他的罚款权移交给了竞争和数字主管玛格丽特·维斯塔格。关于处罚及其计算方式的决定最终将由维斯塔格做出。

📧 欧盟委员会发言人托马斯·雷尼尔表示：“《数字服务法》规定的义务针对的是超大型在线平台或超大型在线搜索引擎的提供者。”“这适用于无论对平台或搜索引擎行使决定性影响的实体是自然人还是法人。”雷尼尔没有进一步详细说明此事。

📨 据悉，特斯拉公司的销售额将免除此计算，因为它是一家上市公司，不受马斯克的完全控制。

The European Union has warned X that it may calculate fines against the social-media platform by including revenue from Elon Musk’s other businesses, including Space Exploration Technologies Corp. and Neuralink Corp., an approach that would significantly increase the potential penalties for violating content moderation rules.Under the EU’s Digital Services Act, the bloc can slap online platforms with fines of as much as 6% of their yearly global revenue for failing to tackle illegal content and disinformation or follow transparency rules. Regulators are considering whether sales from SpaceX, Neuralink, xAI and the Boring Company, in addition to revenue generated from the social network, should be included to determine potential fines against X, people familiar with the matter said, asking not to be identified because the information isn’t public. The European Commission has been investigating X for several potential breaches of the Digital Services Act, newly introduced rules meant to ensure platforms police illegal content. The EU is leading a global crackdown on harmful online content and disinformation that’s sparked increasingly vocal responses from Musk, who has said such measures restrict free speech. X is a private company under Musk’s sole control. In considering revenue from his other companies, the commission is essentially weighing whether Musk himself should be regarded as the entity to fine as opposed to X itself, the people said. Tesla Inc.’s sales would be exempt from this calculation because it’s publicly traded and not under Musk’s full control, one of the people said. The commission hasn’t yet decided whether to penalize X, and the size of any potential fine is still under discussion, the people said. Penalties may be avoided if X finds ways to satisfy the watchdog’s concerns. X would also have the opportunity to challenge any EU decision, but the final say rests with the commission, the people said. X didn’t reply to requests seeking comment. Musk has previously said on X that he will fight any DSA fine through “a very public battle in court.”The review of X began under Thierry Breton, the EU’s former tech czar who often feuded with Musk online and had been granted special powers to enforce the DSA without the need for the commission’s rubber stamp. After Breton resigned in September, he bequeathed his fining powers to competition and digital boss Margrethe Vestager. Decisions on the penalties and how they are calculated would ultimately lie with Vestager.“The obligations under the DSA are addressed to the provider of the very large online platform or very large online search engine,” commission spokesperson Thomas Regnier said. “This applies irrespective of whether the entity exercising decisive influence over the platform or search engine is a natural or legal person.” Regnier didn’t elaborate further on this specific case. Recommended newsletter Data Sheet: Stay on top of the business of tech with thoughtful analysis on the industry's biggest names. Sign up here.