Fortune | FORTUNE 2024年10月12日
COVID-19 raises the stakes for heart attacks, strokes, and even death long after infection, new study finds
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

新冠疫情伊始,专家就担忧其长期影响。新研究表明,2020年感染新冠的人在三年内患重大心血管疾病的风险增加,感染严重者风险更高。研究还发现,风险在三年内未减轻,疫苗可能有保护作用,新冠感染增加心血管风险的原因有待研究,预防措施很重要。

🦠新冠感染风险:2020年感染新冠的人,在诊断后的三年内患重大心血管事件(如心脏病发作、中风或死亡)的风险是未感染者的两倍,感染严重需住院的人风险更高。

💉疫苗的作用:研究时感染者未接种疫苗,专家推测疫苗可能对心血管风险有保护作用,公众应注重感染预防策略,了解新冠长期风险。

📋研究的发现:新冠可能导致内皮细胞炎症、激活补体系统等,增加心血管风险且风险持续多年,遗传学也起一定作用,初步分析显示阿司匹林或可降低住院患者心血管风险。

🌍研究的局限与展望:该研究对象多为欧洲白人,研究者希望在其他人群中复制研究结果,以进一步验证结论。

Practically from the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, researchers and medical experts feared–and often loudly warned–that the virus wasn’t like other infections that people might encounter during, say, flu season. SARS-CoV-2 was different. It was worse. And the potential long-term effects, as we reported two years ago, were even more worrisome.A new large-scale study puts those longer-range concerns into bold relief. The results are as unforgiving as many experts had hypothesized.The study, involving nearly a quarter-million adults, found that those with any type of COVID-19 infection in 2020 had twice the risk of suffering a major cardiac event—a heart attack, stroke, or even death—in the three years after a diagnosis than those who weren’t infected.People whose infections were severe enough to warrant hospitalization faced nearly a four times greater risk of a major cardiac event or death than the uninfected group.“These findings are undeniable and extremely troubling,” says David Putrino, the director of the Cohen Center for Recovery from Complex Chronic Illness at Mount Sinai School of Medicine. “The significance of this work is that our current public health policy surrounding COVID-19 is inadequate. People need to be informed of the risks they are incurring to their long-term health by being repeatedly infected with SARS-CoV-2.”There is a chilling truth to those words. While experts and major medical institutions still find themselves debunking myths about the virus and the vaccines developed to fight it, the longer-term research tells a story of lives irrevocably altered by COVID-19 infections and argues strongly for vaccination and other mitigations against the virus.The study was published Oct. 9 in the American Heart Association’s peer-reviewed journal Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis and Vascular Biology. The report’s authors and researchers analyzed data from the U.K. Biobank system, including the data for more than 8,000 adults who had a positive lab test for COVID-19 in 2020 and another 2,000 or so whose cases required hospitalization. Results were compared with nearly 220,000 adults in the database who were not diagnosed with COVID-19 during that time.In the nearly three years following the acute infection in 2020, the study’s authors found double the risk of heart attack, stroke, and death compared with the uninfected group. Somewhat surprisingly, the elevated risks did not abate over the three years of study, suggesting a problematic staying effect.“The two-fold increased risk observed in year one following infection was also seen in year two, and even year three,” says study author Stanley Hazen, chair of the Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences at the Cleveland Clinic. “This was seen in all subjects independent of age, sex, or risk factors for cardiac disease.” (The ages of those in the study ranged from 50 to 86, with an average age of 67.)What’s more, in a subset analysis of hospitalized cases without known heart disease, infection with the virus raised the risk for heart attack, stroke, or death to the same levels as individuals who had a history of heart disease, diabetes, or peripheral artery disease (PAD)—but not COVID-19.“This is why we refer to COVID as a coronary artery disease risk equivalent,” says Hooman Allayee, principal investigator of the study and a professor at USC’s Keck School of Medicine in Los Angeles. “Getting severe COVID is just as bad for heart attacks and strokes as having pre-existing heart disease.”Those I interviewed were quick to note a critical distinction and key limitation of the study: None of the individuals was vaccinated at the time of their infection, as COVID-19 vaccines were not available in 2020.“The study didn’t look at the effects of COVID-19 vaccination on a person’s cardiovascular risk,” Hazen says. “I suspect that it would be protective, because vaccines usually keep COVID infections from becoming severe.”Putrino agrees. “Our team has been consistently advocating for the public to focus on infection prevention strategies such as masking, clean air, and vaccination in order to best avoid acute SARS-CoV-2 infection,” he says. “The public should be educating themselves on the long-term risks associated with COVID infection.” How COVID-19 elevates the risk for cardiovascular problems is the subject of much study and conjecture. Research into long COVID has highlighted the disease’s deleterious effects on the body’s normal functions over time, and some of the same factors may well be at work here.“COVID-19 may lead to inflammation of endothelial cells (that line blood vessels),” says Ziyad Al-Aly, chief of research and development at VA St. Louis Health Care, whose previous work foretold many of the results from the U.K. Biobank study. “It can also activate the complement system and increase the propensity to form clots; it may also destabilize or inflame plaques in the coronary arteries,” Al-Aly says. “These mechanisms may explain the significant increase in (cardiovascular) risk and the durability of that increase in risk over many years.”Notably, the new study found that genetics also played a role. For example, hospitalization for COVID-19 doubled the risk of heart attack or stroke among individuals with blood types A, B, or AB, but didn’t change the risk for those with O blood type.Allayee also says he would “very much like” to replicate the study’s major findings in additional populations, “since U.K. Biobank is mostly European whites.” He says the research group is already trying to get access to other datasets in order to do that.But the findings are robust and pretty clear: COVID-19 infection raises the stakes with respect to heart attacks, strokes, and even death. That effect continues three years post-infection. And severe infections make those risks even worse.We know from other studies that vaccination can reduce the severity of infection, the need for hospitalization, and the risk of death associated with COVID-19 infections. Yet in the U.S., about one in five people had not received a single COVID-19 vaccine shot as of last year, to say nothing of a full dose or an updated vaccine.The study also found in a preliminary analysis that hospitalized COVID-19 patients who were already taking aspirin, did not have a significantly increased cardiovascular risk. That suggests that the risk can potentially be mitigated but still requires further study, says Allayee.“I would use these data (from the study) as a sign to be more aggressive in prevention: healthy diet, exercise, controlling your blood pressure and cholesterol, stopping smoking,” says Sandeep Das, co-chair of the American Heart Association’s COVID-19 CVD Registry committee and a director at UT Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas. “I think this study should perhaps push some people out of complacency and into thinking about their longer-term risk.”That process should involve vaccination. It may well mean more aggressive masking and paying attention to the air quality around one’s daily routines. But none of that can happen without an awareness that, as much as some people want to believe otherwise, COVID-19 remains an active threat to public and personal health, including your own history with the virus.“You may have forgotten that you had COVID years ago, but it has not forgotten about you,” Al-Aly says, “Trivializing COVID as just a cold or an inconsequential nothing-burger is wishful thinking that does not align with scientific evidence.”More must-read commentary published by Fortune:The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

新冠感染 心血管疾病 疫苗 预防措施
相关文章