未知数据源 2024年10月02日
Why we need gender equality in big science
index_new5.html
../../../zaker_core/zaker_tpl_static/wap/tpl_guoji1.html

 

本文探讨了大科学领域中性别平等的重要性。作者指出,尽管大科学项目在科学、经济和社会方面都具有重要意义,但性别平等却很少被视为一个必要目标。作者分析了欧洲联盟在促进大科学领域性别平等方面所做的努力,包括推出“女性参与大科学商业论坛” (WBSBF) 和“地平线欧洲”计划等举措。文章还强调了大科学项目在招聘、培训和预算分配方面需要采取措施来促进性别平等,并鼓励更多女性参与大科学领域。

👩‍🔬 **大科学项目在招聘和预算分配方面需要采取措施来促进性别平等。** 作者指出,尽管大科学项目在科学、经济和社会方面都具有重要意义,但性别平等却很少被视为一个必要目标。这反映在欧洲联盟的“地平线 2020”计划中,该计划的“研究基础设施影响评估路径”项目包含 122 个“影响指标”,但仅有一个指标涉及性别平等。

🤝 **大科学项目应与其他组织合作,共同推动性别平等。** 作者介绍了“女性参与大科学商业论坛” (WBSBF) 的成立背景和主要活动。WBSBF 由一群来自“融合能源”组织的人员发起,旨在促进大科学领域性别平等。WBSBF 通过举办会议、颁发奖项等方式,鼓励大科学组织采取措施增加女性员工和用户比例。

🏆 **大科学项目应表彰和奖励在促进性别平等方面取得的成功。** 作者提到 WBSBF 在 2022 年推出了“女性参与大科学商业论坛”认可奖,以表彰和奖励大科学组织在促进性别平等方面取得的成功。该奖项设有三个类别:“组织文化进步”、“合作伙伴关系”和“社会影响”。

👩‍🎓 **大科学项目应为女性提供更多机会,帮助她们在该领域取得成功。** 作者指出,大科学项目需要更多女性参与,并希望通过 WBSBF 的一些举措来扭转这一局面。作者还提到了 WBSBF 的实习计划,该计划将为 3 到 5 名学生或应届毕业生提供实习机会,这些实习机会可以是科学或技术领域的,也可以是法律、传播或人力资源等领域的。

Investments in “big-science” projects, whether it’s the next particle collider or a new synchrotron, are often justified in terms of the benefits for science, such as the discovery of a new particle or the opening of a new vista on the cosmos. The positive impact of large facilities on society and the economy are often cited too, such as spin-off technologies in medical physics. Gender equality, however, is rarely acknowledged as a necessary objective when building these multi-billion-euro facilities or investing in the research required to develop them. That lack of focus on gender equality is something that I believe must change.

The lack of gender-based targets for big science is laid bare in a tool created as part of the European Union’s Horizon 2020 funding programme. Produced by the Research Infrastructure Impact Assessment Pathways project, it assesses the impact of research infrastructures on the economy and society via 122 “impact indicators” in four areas: human resources; policy; society; and economy and innovation. But only one indicator – contribution to gender balance in society – gives any mention to gender equality.

Yet improvements can be made when it comes to supporting female scientists in big science. Take the EU-wide ATTRACT project, which funds the development of breakthrough technologies via proof-of-concept projects. It is led by large research organizations such as the CERN particle-physics laboratory near Geneva, the X-ray Free Electron Laser in Hamburg, Germany, and the European Southern Observatory. Between 2018 and 2020, ATTRACT supported 170 projects, half of which focused on health, environment and biological and related sciences. However, only 11% of the funded ATTRACT projects had a woman as the principal investigator, even though women receive almost half of doctoral degrees in those areas.

Such numbers tell us we have a long way to go. After all, big-science facilities receive significant amounts of public money and employ thousands of people in different professional roles. We need to promote big science as a career destination not only for science graduates but also those in law, management and policy. Monitoring gender balance among the staff and users of research infrastructures and the members of big-science projects is crucial to ensuring that women graduates, who outnumber men in Europe, see big science as a place where they can thrive professionally.

In that regard, there have been some positive developments. The EU’s €96bn Horizon Europe programme – the successor to Horizon 2020 – now requires that all benefiting organizations, many of which participate in big-science projects, have a gender equality plan. Several industry sectors are also doing lots to integrate equality, diversity and inclusion into human resources practices to attract talent.

Tapping into the talent pool

But more needs to be done. That’s why since 2020 the Women in Big Science Business Forum (WBSBF) has been promoting gender equality as part of the Big Science Business Forum (BSBF). The WBSBF was set up by a group of people at Fusion for Energy, which manages the EU’s contribution to the ITER fusion experiment being built in France. The BSBF itself is trying to advance gender equality across research infrastructures, universities and supplier companies. For instance, since research infrastructures distribute billions of euros of public money in procurement and investment, they can adopt procurement processes that question the supplier’s compliance with gender-equality legislation and ask for examples of efforts they have made to recruit and retain women.

“Gender budgeting” is a tool that big-science projects can also use to assess how their budget decisions impact gender equality. That could mean eliminating the gender pay gap, making provisions for equal parental leave or ensuring that research grants are the same for projects whether led by women or men. Budgets could also be earmarked to help staff achieve a work–life balance. I think it’s important as well that we improve training in gender equality and that we “gender proof” recruitment by identifying and removing potential biases to assessment criteria that could favour men. Big-science projects can also make use of the European Charter & Code for Researchers, which includes a dozen gender-equality indicators as part of the EU initiative “human resources strategy for researchers”.

At the BSBF meeting in Granada in 2022, the WBSBF launched a recognition award to acknowledge, celebrate and promote successful measures taken by big-science organizations to increase the proportion of women among their staff and users of research infrastructures. There are three categories: “advances in organizational culture”; “collaborative partnerships”; and “societal impact”. Some 13 organizations applied for an award in 2022, with organizations such as XFEL and CERN being recognized.

The WBSBF is building on that progress at this year’s BSBF event in Trieste, Italy, in October with activities on socially responsible procurement, gender balance in work policies, and the socioeconomic impact of investment in big science. There will also be a live-streamed round-table session with leaders from big science. At Trieste, we’ll also be introducing a WBSBF trainee scheme, which will place three to five students or recent graduates on in-house trainee programmes run by labs, companies or intergovernmental bodies taking part in BSBF. Those roles don’t have to be scientific or technical, but could also be in, say, legal, communication or human resources.

Big science needs more women and I hope these initiatives will help to turn the tide. The talent pool for women is already there and big science must get better at tapping into it, not only for the discoveries that lie ahead but also for building a better relationship with society.

The post Why we need gender equality in big science appeared first on Physics World.

Fish AI Reader

Fish AI Reader

AI辅助创作,多种专业模板,深度分析,高质量内容生成。从观点提取到深度思考,FishAI为您提供全方位的创作支持。新版本引入自定义参数,让您的创作更加个性化和精准。

FishAI

FishAI

鱼阅,AI 时代的下一个智能信息助手,助你摆脱信息焦虑

联系邮箱 441953276@qq.com

相关标签

性别平等 大科学 女性 WBSBF 地平线欧洲
相关文章